drplokta: (Default)
[personal profile] drplokta
This year, I thought I'd see how many different species I could spot on the Rotherhithe peninsula, which has pretty diverse habitats for 2/3 of a square mile of Inner London.

A few ground-rules:
  1. The area is bounded by and includes the River Thames, Plough Way, Lower Road and King's Stairs Gardens. The far shore of the Thames does not count. See map here.
  2. Air-breathing vertebrates and butterflies only. Fish are too dull and hard to see, and invertebrates are too numerous and hard to identify. Amphibians at a non-air-breathing stage count, but will probably also be hard to identify.
  3. Domesticated animals, including homo sapiens, don't count, but escaped or released animals do (e.g. the turtles living in Canada Water).
  4. Dead animals don't count, even though that's the only way I'm likely to find a hedgehog.
  5. Photos to be provided where possible, but it still counts if I can't get a photo.
  6. Hearing but not seeing does not count.
  7. Updates to be posted behind a cut tag for the benefit of those people who don't want to download large numbers of blurry thumbnails.
  8. Herring gulls, lesser black-backed gulls, yellow-legged gulls and Caspian gulls are different species. Whether or not I can tell the difference is another matter.


[Poll #900960]

Good Luck

Date: 2007-01-05 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whotheheckami.livejournal.com
Will be counting the various species of humanity? Geek, Goth, Fanboy etc? ;@)

Re: Good Luck

Date: 2007-01-05 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frostfox.livejournal.com
Are you sure they are all domesticated?
Wot about chavs?
And I know several students who aren't housebroken.

FF - who has a *proper* owl (it goes 'twowit-twoo' as proper owls should) living in the trees at the end of the road.

Re: Good Luck

Date: 2007-01-08 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hjsb.livejournal.com
Sounds like you've got two owls...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-05 02:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mkillingworth.livejournal.com
Are you counting insects?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-05 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bellinghman.livejournal.com
Unless it's a water-breathing butterfly?

(English so needs better parsing rules.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-05 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bellinghman.livejournal.com
Hah, picky, picky! It could be drowning at the time.

But you're excluding giant land crabs. A coconut crab would surely be worth noting.

(And don't give me none of this guff about no coconut crabs never being seen nowhere near you.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-05 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bellinghman.livejournal.com
Rule 8: hmmm, controversial!

(Ring species - the classic creationist bugbear.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-06 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com
Thinking about this, I think 65 is if anything an underestimate.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-14 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
I couldn't do the poll because there was no 42!

Though that's quite close to the mean, so maybe I could trend it down a bit...

(Though as I accidentally voted for no number, I won't bother trying...)

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags