drplokta: (Default)
[personal profile] drplokta
First in an occasional series pointing out why ideas that are under discussion are stupid.

Today, we look at setting a minimum price per unit for alcohol. This is a stupid idea because it immediately turns (formerly) cheap booze into a massively profitable line for the supermarkets, with no price competition to worry about. This means that they will spend tens of millions promoting it, and sales may even increase.

The smart thing to do instead is to increase tax, bring tax levels more into line with alcohol content, and perhaps prohibit selling alcohol at below cost price as the government is proposing (although this, while not actively stupid, is very difficult since the government has no way to find out what cost price is).

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-02 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rdmaughan.livejournal.com
Drink Driving went away because it became socially unacceptable. Until it becomes socially unacceptable to go out and get drunk and end up in A&E the problem will continue.

Perhaps a total ban on alcohol advertising should be considered?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-02 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] evil-mogwai.livejournal.com
They said on the news that they were considering having an alcohol advertising ban.

Interestingly in the US they see Drink Driving / DUIs like we do (slight) speeding. I've seen people spouting stuff about different alcohol tolerances, Bars being out of town, living out of town etc. They very much treat it like its the cops and "another revenue collection tactic".

Most states are as lax, or even laxer, on sentences for DUI's that we are speeding. Some people boast about 5th, 6th etc... when do you hear us boasting about our 6th speeding ticket?

And yet you get the other side of the

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags