drplokta: (Default)
[personal profile] drplokta
Bah, O2 aren't giving existing iPhone users the subsidised price to upgrade to the 3G S until their existing contract expires. And they're charging £15 per month extra for tethering, for up to 3GB of data per month. Hope Netshare still works under iPhone OS 3.0.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-09 10:33 am (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker
Not entirely surprising that they don't want to doubly-subsidise their customers. It would seem like an odd business decision.

As someone said on /.
1) Have customer who love shinies.
2) Have 2 year contracts.
3) Produce shinies on a yearly basis.
4) Profit!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-09 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com
It's actually abuse-of-monopoly-provider status. As I said above, I already *know* that 18 month contracts are a terrible idea for me and if I was buying in a real market then I would have chosen to buy on a 12 month contract last year. There's a good chance I'd have been able to get 12 months for the same £35, just with fewer minutes/texts too (I use only a tiny fraction of my allowance)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-09 12:56 pm (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker
Absolutely. Locking a phone to a provider is ridiculous, it removes all competition.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-09 04:37 pm (UTC)
ckd: (cpu)
From: [personal profile] ckd
Agreed. Hey, at least it looks like O2 will have MMS and such from day one unlike AT&T, which seems to have internalized the old AT&T's attitude: "We don't care. We don't have to. We're the phone company."

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags