Plokta Online

[drplokta]

Just a quick post to say that issues 38 & 39 of Plokta are online here, and also point out that it's eligible for the Best Fanzine Hugo. We urge all members of Denvention 3 and Anticipation to nominate, whether or not they choose to nominate Plokta

Comments

[vicarage.livejournal.com]

Thanks. I enjoy reading them online, as it has none of the guilt of not responding to the 'usual' of a paper copy.

[hawkida.livejournal.com]

I don't know if there's reason for concern but while I received the latest paper copy on Friday both cdave and johncoxon said they hadn't yet.

[drplokta]

johncoxon is on our mailing list, but of course it's gone to Peterborough not Leicester. cdave isn't on the list -- he needs to send us a loc or something, or join the convention.

[hawkida.livejournal.com]

JC was in P'boro when we discussed it on Saturday.

cDave will probably see these messages.

[cdave]

I won't see this. And any LoC that suddenly appears for issue 39 in the next few days is only because I am currently attempting to rationalise my book piles, and filing (a.k.a tidy my room).

(I haven't made time to think about the con. It's in my calendar though. I must look at costs soon)

[flickgc.livejournal.com]

I think I did ask you to put cdave on the list, but in your defence I did then fail to chase you about it....

[fishlifter.livejournal.com]

We haven't received a copy either (and the post has arrived for today).

[ang-grrr.livejournal.com]

Yet I have and it's normally my post that disappears!

[flickgc.livejournal.com]

Odd. Based on LoCs, though, it arrived in Australia before Walthamstow, so it may just be the London post being its usual self!

[drplokta]

Have you got it yet? Be warned that it's A5 and looks suspiciously like a Tesco mailshot if you're not paying attention when you open your post.

[the-gardener.livejournal.com]

You may already have noticed this yourself, but -- apart from the introductory blue box -- page 11 of issue 39 appears to be blank.

[drplokta]

Thanks for letting me know -- it looks fine on my machine, which is using Apple's native PDF support instead of Acrobat Reader. What version of Acrobat Reader do you have?

[fishlifter.livejournal.com]

I'm seeing the same thing as the_gardener. Using Acrobat Reader 9.0.0.
---Mark

[drplokta]

Should be fixed now. Thanks for the reports. Next time I'll check in Acrobat Reader as well as Apple Preview.