Since I've abdicated, I guess this isn't actually legally binding. But everyone should do it anyway.
How to Write UK Phone Numbers
UK phone numbers are written as the dialling code, including the 0 national prefix, followed by the phone number. They may alternatively be written as +44 followed by the dialling code (excluding the 0 national prefix), followed by the phone number. You may not try to combine the national and international versions into one -- if you want to give both versions, give both versions. If you want, you can put brackets around a geographic dialling code -- but not around a non-geographic one that can never be omitted from the number. 7 digit phone numbers may be grouped 3-4 (with no punctuation). 8 digit phone numbers may be grouped 4-4. Nice and simple, isn't it? So why do so many people get it wrong?
Mostly because they don't know their dialling code. There are no such dialling codes as 0207 and 0208. London has a dialling code of 020 and eight digit phone numbers. All mobile phone numbers have five digit dialling codes (including the 0) and six digit number. The recently issued dialling codes starting 011 are all four digit codes and seven digit numbers.
So the following are correct:
020 7123 4567
07941 123456
+44 118 912 3456
National: 01244 123456
International: +44 1244 123456
(01244) 123456
0845 7484950
And the following are wrong:
0207 123 4567
0794 112 3456
+44 (0)118 912 3456
01189 123456
(0845) 7484950
Is that clear?
How to Write UK Phone Numbers
UK phone numbers are written as the dialling code, including the 0 national prefix, followed by the phone number. They may alternatively be written as +44 followed by the dialling code (excluding the 0 national prefix), followed by the phone number. You may not try to combine the national and international versions into one -- if you want to give both versions, give both versions. If you want, you can put brackets around a geographic dialling code -- but not around a non-geographic one that can never be omitted from the number. 7 digit phone numbers may be grouped 3-4 (with no punctuation). 8 digit phone numbers may be grouped 4-4. Nice and simple, isn't it? So why do so many people get it wrong?
Mostly because they don't know their dialling code. There are no such dialling codes as 0207 and 0208. London has a dialling code of 020 and eight digit phone numbers. All mobile phone numbers have five digit dialling codes (including the 0) and six digit number. The recently issued dialling codes starting 011 are all four digit codes and seven digit numbers.
So the following are correct:
020 7123 4567
07941 123456
+44 118 912 3456
National: 01244 123456
International: +44 1244 123456
(01244) 123456
0845 7484950
And the following are wrong:
0207 123 4567
0794 112 3456
+44 (0)118 912 3456
01189 123456
(0845) 7484950
Is that clear?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 12:06 pm (UTC)It is acceptable to write mobile numbers as a 5-digit number followed by two groups of three.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 12:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 12:37 pm (UTC)* 3-4-4 structure:
02x xxxx xxxx
07x xxxx xxxx
* 4-3-4 structure
01x1 xxx xxxx
011x xxx xxxx
08xx xxx xxxx (though sometimes 08xxx xxxxxx)
*5-6 structure
01xxx xxxxxx
I have a PHP subroutine that formats a number if anyone wants a copy ...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 12:59 pm (UTC)There is also a convention I've seen quite a lot which goes +int(area)local. For example +44(118)9123456. I think it may have been introduced by Windows 95, so that's probably reason enough to shun it, but it has the advantage of being machine readable, so dialers know which bits to strip off for local calls.
It strikes me that the Americans have had a clear, simple system since at least the 70s, and possibly earlier. You used to be able to tell how important an area was by adding the digits of the area code together (with zero=10), so Washington had 212 while Alaska had 909. On radial dial phones (or pulse dial push phones) it meant that the shorter area codes dialed faster. Of course once tone dial came in it didn't make a difference.
In Ireland we seem to be gradually moving to a uniform 3+7 system, except in Dublin, which is 2+7. But we still have some old numbers which don't fit at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 01:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 01:44 pm (UTC)It is not necessarily clear to foreigners, especially USians what the zero is for. Having it in brackets helps there. Most phone diallers should now scrub the zero. If they can't, have the manufacturer call me and I'll arrange to have their dialler fixed.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 01:59 pm (UTC)B
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 02:00 pm (UTC)Italy is much worse.
B
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 02:34 pm (UTC)Quite agree. But the reason so many people get this wrong is undoubtedly because of the way the codes were introduced, fooling a significant fraction of people into thinking that they were keeping their old seven-digit numbers and having the area code altered, instead of having their numbers altered. And all the tea in China won't make them believe otherwise.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 02:36 pm (UTC)Unless of course Magneto fixes it...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 03:50 pm (UTC)american public phones are shit
James
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 03:56 pm (UTC)So the following are correct:
020 7123 4567
07941 123456
+44 118 912 3456
National: 01244 123456
International: +44 1244 123456
(01244) 123456
no they aint, I tried both and they dont work!
and the following are wrong:
(0845) 7484950
eh-eh again minionite, you is wrong
this goes through to national rail enquiries......
it works fine
No wonder your flicks minion
death to all minionites
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 03:59 pm (UTC)Checks... Hmmm... Nope... Pretty sure it's fixed in Magneto. If not, I'll mention it. It's certainly on a bug list somewhere. I thought they were going to do it when they fixed the brackets bug in Stinger.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 04:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 04:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 05:25 pm (UTC)0410 xxxxxx => 077 10xx xxxx
thus a 3-4-4 presentation, in line with the 02 (and 03) series' numbers. I believe it was also the case that, initially at least, 070, 071, 072 ... 079 could be linked aross to which network the number was to be on (but number portability then put paid to that idea!)
With non-geographic numbers it is all a matter of presentation anyway rather than a distinct 'exchange - subscriber' structure as all digits must be dialed, unlike geographic numbers where you can still dial within main (as opposed to sub-) exchange.
Now then ... where did I put that reverse search database ... ;-P
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 05:32 pm (UTC)Also not helped by telco suppliers still using the format, eg. Telewest, where they print my call log using 0207 xxx xxxx numbers not 020 7xxx xxxx. I have complained, but does it bother them? pah!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 05:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-07 06:35 pm (UTC)K.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-08 10:12 am (UTC)077 xxx xxxxx
I therefore apologize in advance for annoying you ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-08 12:55 pm (UTC)