(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-11 12:17 pm (UTC)
drplokta: (0)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
Unless we've mispriced the environmental cost of the extra emissions, then in those circumstances 6x current emissions would indeed be the best solution. There would be a lot of environmental problems, but a vast amount of money that could be used to tackle those problems (six times current emissions would be about 150 billion tons, which at $50 per ton would generate US$750 billion per year, over 1% of total world GDP).
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags